Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Stephen Ladyman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 1 February 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on MSC Napoli.


MSC Napoli

I am grateful to the hon. Member for Rochdale (Paul Rowen) for his constructive comments. I am afraid that the Western Morning News is not normally served with my breakfast. Clearly, I shall have to put that right in future. I have not read the report to which the hon. Member for Rochdale referred but I have spoken to SOSREP since he gave the interview, and he was concerned that some of his comments might be taken out of context. I believe that he was trying to explain to the journalist that the vessel had suffered significant damage and that there was a risk of further break-up. Consequently, he appropriately put together several contingency plans based on what might happen under those circumstances. One hopes that they will not be necessary. Every time a container is taken off the ship, the stress on it becomes less and the likelihood of break-up or further damage is reduced. I hope that we can get through the process without further major spillage. If we can get all the oil off by the end of Sunday, the risk of serious oil pollution is minimal. Plans are therefore in place if the worst happens, but that is not expected at the moment. Local authorities should make an appropriate claim through the civil courts for the recovery of their costs. We will support them in that. We have spoken to the owners’ representative and been informed of their views. They are being constructive and helpful and do not appear to penny-pinch in any way. I am therefore confident that we can resolve everybody’s claims satisfactorily. A marine Bill would have made no difference to the incident. Such a measure would not alter SOSREP’s decisions in such circumstances. When SOSREP is faced with the possibility of environmental catastrophe if a ship is allowed to sink in deep water, he has to take account of myriad things. Of course, he will consider the environmental sensitivity of a particular area, and weigh up whether less sensitive areas are an option. Ultimately, however, he must make sure that the vessel can either be put into a harbour safely or beached safely. A marine Bill would not have made any difference, and nor would any other device that Devon county council has been asking for to protect that stretch of coastline. By taking action we have protected the coastline, as the area would have suffered from pollution for many years to come had the vessel been allowed to sink at sea.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
456 c381-2 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Oil Pollution Merchant shipping Security Wrecks Theft Salvage Containers MSC Napoli Lyme Bay
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk