Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
My Lords, I thought that in the McCann case the House of Lords said that the correct test was whether the court was sure. If that is so, that is indistinguishable from the criminal test. So can we not get away from the civil test altogether?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c764
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Courts Assets Anti-social behaviour Assets Recovery Agency Aiding and abetting Fraud Electronic surveillance Firearms Judgements Inchoate offences Police Proceeds of crime Nature conservation Passports Taxation Right of search Revenue and Customs Anti-social behaviour orders Serious Organised Crime Agency Angling Personal names Information Commissioner's Office Serious crime prevention orders
- Legislation
- Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:06:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_376663
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_376663
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_376663