Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 27 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.


Greater London Authority Bill

I have listened carefully to the Minister. I suspect that he and I both have a sense of déjà vu about tonight’s debate and I noticed that the Minister could not identify a Back Bencher who supported the Government’s case. I thank Conservative Members for supporting our case and I am beginning to detect—especially in the hon. Members for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) and for Croydon, Central (Mr. Pelling)—certain Liberal Democrat tendencies, which will do them no good in their careers. The Minister claims that the model has been tried and tested, but that does not mean that it could not be improved. That is what new clause 8 seeks to do by providing more oversight, more scrutiny and more checks and balances. The Minister has not convinced me that we should do anything other than vote for new clause 8 tonight. Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:— The House divided: Ayes 196, Noes 286.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
457 c841 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Costs City of London Council tax Housing Finance Environment Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Functions Landfill Incinerators Local government Planning permission Powers Public appointments Planning Members Railways Recycling Property development Mayor of London Training Transport Waste disposal Waste Underground railways Transport for London London Assembly London Waste Regulation Authority River Thames Pedicabs
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk