Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 March 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007.
Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007
Frankly, I can deal with that without advice, but I shall take a nod or a shake from behind me. It is not our intention to breach commercial confidentiality and put businesses at risk by disclosing their plans. I presume that there must be, if not in the regulations then in the legislation supporting them, a measure on the recording of data. Data are aggregated, and there is no publication by company. Although we are down to only 100—the industry will know which 100 they are—there will be no disclosure of a company’s confidential information at all. That would not be appropriate under any circumstances. On Question, Motion agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 690 c34GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- ICT Exports Recycling Packaging Registration Small businesses Supermarkets Waste disposal Waste Aluminium
- Legislation
- Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:46:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_382546
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_382546
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_382546