Proceeding contribution from Andrew George (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on Trident.
Trident
Does the Secretary of State not think that it might be dangerous folly to use the expression ““nuclear deterrent”” in this context? Does she accept that these proposals are hardly going to deter Iran and North Korea? Will she explain her policy in the context of its deterring those two countries from continuing with their plans?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 458 c303
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Defence Arms control Expenditure National security Nuclear weapons Procurement Navy Military bases Nuclear disarmament Proliferation Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Terrorism USA Nuclear submarines Trident
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:18:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_384879
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_384879
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_384879