Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Gerald Kaufman (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 14 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on Trident.


Trident

What I do remember is that the right hon. Lady supported the document before the national executive, as did Robin Cook. At that time, when we were considering these matters, the German Foreign Minister said to me:"““agreements are better than unilateral moves because they can be verified and cannot be reversed.””" That, of course, was after the Labour party’s disastrous defeat in the 1983 general election on a manifesto that I called"““the longest suicide note in history””." That, of course, was when my right hon. and noble Friend Lord Kinnock was still hoping to become Prime Minister rather than a twice-failed Leader of the Opposition. And that, of course, was before India, Pakistan and North Korea had become nuclear weapons powers. That shift of policy removed an insuperable barrier to the Labour party’s electoral credibility. Without it, many of my hon. Friends would not be in this House today, including some who may be contemplating voting against the Government this evening. Do those hon. Friends really believe that our shared objective of world nuclear disarmament can be achieved by unilateral disarmament by Britain? Do they really believe that if we gave up Trident, the eight other nuclear weapons powers would say, ““Good old Britain! They have done the right thing. We must follow suit.””? Pull the other one!


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
458 c344 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Defence Arms control Expenditure National security Nuclear weapons Procurement Navy Military bases Nuclear disarmament Proliferation Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Terrorism USA Nuclear submarines Trident
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk