Proceeding contribution from Lord Moser (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 24 April 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Statistics and Registration Service Bill.
Statistics and Registration Service Bill
The simple answer is that many clauses relate to the Treasury rather than to the Cabinet Office, so the decision must be taken anyhow. I do not want to repeat everything that I have already said but, quite apart from all those points, from the point of view of public perception and integrity, one department will be mentioned as being responsible for residual roles, and it would be better for it to be the Cabinet Office rather than the Treasury.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c597
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Accountability Accountancy Finance Government departments Membership Public appointments Parliamentary scrutiny Staff Office for National Statistics Statistics Regional planning and development Treasury Retail prices index Cabinet Office Statistics Commission UK Statistics Authority
- Legislation
- Statistics and Registration Service Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:27:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391689
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391689
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_391689