Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

Despite the almost universal scorn poured on the amendments, I am pleased that we have been able to have this constructive and important debate. As the hon. Member for South-West Hertfordshire (Mr. Gauke) said, the reason why it has been so difficult to table amendments is that Opposition parties cannot cover all the aspects of the proposals announced in the Budget. It is clear, however, where the costs will come from and where they will go. Table 1.2 shows that removal of the starting rate of income tax will raise revenue of £7.3 billion for the Treasury in the first year. The cost of reducing the basic rate will be £8 billion, which will partly be offset by aligning income tax and national insurance contributions. The Chief Secretary is right to say that changes to national insurance contributions require primary legislation, but the Finance Bill is primary legislation, so it could be used to adjust primary legislation on national insurance. He may say that in recent decades there has been no announcement of such changes to take effect in the same year, but over the past 10 years there have been no income tax changes at all.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c1290 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountancy Debts Corporation tax Capital allowances Casinos Gambling Investment Excise duties Employment agencies Gaming Internet Partnerships Welfare tax credits Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Self-employed Managed service companies Off-payroll working
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk