Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.

Finance Bill

I do not wish to prolong the debate, but I have to say to my hon. Friend that it is news to me that the Gambling Commission has the power to interpret primary legislation, and that is what the provision will be. However, I think that I understand the spirit of the Government’s approach to schedule 1, which is that credit card companies and other such companies should not be covered. One way forward might be to consider a definition of ““facilities”” in proposed new section 26A(3). Question put and agreed to. Clause 7 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Clause 8 ordered to stand part of the Bill. Schedule 1 agreed to.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c1304-5 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountancy Debts Corporation tax Capital allowances Casinos Gambling Investment Excise duties Employment agencies Gaming Internet Partnerships Welfare tax credits Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Self-employed Managed service companies Off-payroll working
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk