Proceeding contribution from Stephen Hesford (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
You really hit the nail on the head for this debate, Mr. Gale. Of the two amendments, amendment No. 14 is slightly better than amendment No. 1, in the sense that it is less disingenuous. If what the hon. Member for Chipping Barnet (Mrs. Villiers) said is to be taken at face value, the debate that we should be having—but which we cannot have, because schedule 3 is not before us, as you quite correctly pointed out, Mr. Gale—is on a group of amendments to schedule 3, not this one.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c1317
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountancy Debts Corporation tax Capital allowances Casinos Gambling Investment Excise duties Employment agencies Gaming Internet Partnerships Welfare tax credits Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Self-employed Managed service companies Off-payroll working
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:10:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393570
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393570
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393570