Proceeding contribution from Stephen Hesford (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
Yes, absolutely—cracking the nut with a sledgehammer. However, I shall address that point in my concluding remarks. The other matter that worried me when I listened to the hon. Member for Chipping Barnet was that of the three institutions that she chose to quote in support of her argument—I am not talking about schedule 3, and she will tell me if I have miscounted—two were not related to the industry. One was the Chartered Institute of Taxation and the other was the Law Society. They are removed from the issue, because they are just practitioners.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c1319
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountancy Debts Corporation tax Capital allowances Casinos Gambling Investment Excise duties Employment agencies Gaming Internet Partnerships Welfare tax credits Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Self-employed Managed service companies Off-payroll working
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:10:12 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393584
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393584
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_393584