Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HC) on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

The hon. Lady might be right. However, I did not refer to those vulnerable workers in the way she suggests. I did not say that they did not realise that they were part of a managed service company. What I would describe as bogus self-employment—not in an ““illegal”” sense—has existed for many years. Under Margaret Thatcher’s Government, milk deliverers were pushed into what most of would regard in a moral sense, though not in a legal sense, as bogus self-employment. There was a fad for it, because of the tax regime. The milkmen realised what they were doing, but they were effectively given no option by those who had hitherto employed them. It is a scandal that has continued for years, and clause 25, along with schedule 3, will help to deal with it. I do not think we should delay any longer. Both amendments suggest that we should, but I think that there has been enough consultation and enough knowledge of these problems for a long time, and that we should reject the amendments.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c1324 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Accountancy Debts Corporation tax Capital allowances Casinos Gambling Investment Excise duties Employment agencies Gaming Internet Partnerships Welfare tax credits Small businesses Tax allowances Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Self-employed Managed service companies Off-payroll working
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk