Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on Protection of Critical Infrastructure.
Protection of Critical Infrastructure
As I think will be clear to anyone who has read the original Commission proposal, the Green Paper and indeed the directive, although the Commission’s list of elements on which it wants a common European position includes postal services—which are not obviously critical to security—it also includes armed forces. I know that the proposal by the Commission was rebuffed by the Government, and I hope it will not appear again, because it was over-ambitious; but what about the channel tunnel? It is a critical piece of infrastructure linking two countries, and only two countries. Would the Government draw a red line around that, and say that they would not allow it to be ruled on by the Commission or the European Court of Justice?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c1524
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Finance Energy Infrastructure EU action Emergencies EU common foreign and security policy National security Terrorism Natural disasters
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-04 14:43:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394502
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394502
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394502