Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Michael Connarty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on Protection of Critical Infrastructure.


Protection of Critical Infrastructure

As I think will be clear to anyone who has read the original Commission proposal, the Green Paper and indeed the directive, although the Commission’s list of elements on which it wants a common European position includes postal services—which are not obviously critical to security—it also includes armed forces. I know that the proposal by the Commission was rebuffed by the Government, and I hope it will not appear again, because it was over-ambitious; but what about the channel tunnel? It is a critical piece of infrastructure linking two countries, and only two countries. Would the Government draw a red line around that, and say that they would not allow it to be ruled on by the Commission or the European Court of Justice?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c1524 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Finance Energy Infrastructure EU action Emergencies EU common foreign and security policy National security Terrorism Natural disasters
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk