Proceeding contribution from David Heathcoat-Amory (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 2 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on Protection of Critical Infrastructure.
Protection of Critical Infrastructure
My hon. and learned Friend has referred to a voluntary approach. He will know—this follows from his earlier remarks—that there are security assets and facilities both in this country and in other countries that we would prefer not to declare, for security reasons. Is he aware that under the draft directive we would have not only to declare those assets, but to draw up and operate a security plan and appoint a security liaison officer, all of which would presumably be public? Would it not be a grave threat to our internal security if all of that were known as provided for under a directive, and if the final arbiter of that were the European Court of Justice?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c1527
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Finance Energy Infrastructure EU action Emergencies EU common foreign and security policy National security Terrorism Natural disasters
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-02-04 14:43:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394509
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394509
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394509