Proceeding contribution from Lord Slynn of Hadley (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 27 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
My Lords, I do not regard this amendment as simply raising a question of semantics or linguistics. It carries within it a very important question of principle as to the relative functions of the courts and the Probation Service. The distinction between punishment and enforcement of court orders is very real. That should not be overlooked. Subject to that, I wholly agree with the points made by the noble Lord, Lord Ramsbotham, so I will not repeat them or risk spoiling them by paraphrasing them. I well understand the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Judd, that there is a difference between enforcement and implementation. But if one is better than the other, I believe that it is only by a whisker. I am perfectly content to go along with the word proposed in the amendment, which I support.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 693 c620
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Offenders Private sector Prisons Probation Voluntary organisations Young offenders Reoffenders Secure accommodation
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:36:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406118
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406118
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406118