Proceeding contribution from John Pugh (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Friday, 29 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Historic Counties, Towns and Villages (Traffic Signs and Mapping) Bill.
Historic Counties, Towns and Villages (Traffic Signs and Mapping) Bill
The corollary of the argument is that because Liverpool was once in the historic county of Lancashire, it would not therefore be in Merseyside, because there was no historic county of Merseyside. A major review would be required.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 462 c602
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Constituencies Administration Cultural heritage Greater London History Local government Maps Non-metropolitan counties Place names Road signs and markings
- Legislation
- Historic Counties Towns and Villages (Traffic Signs and Mapping) Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:35:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406822
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406822
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406822