Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Oakeshott. Many statutes are simply lifted from previous statutes and made according to the Victorian parliamentary draftsman’s handbook, which has not been updated to move with the times. The term ““gratuity”” is extremely old-fashioned. I would have been quite happy to concede previously that it has been used in other legislation. I am grateful to the Minister for considering the points that I made in Committee and responding on the pensions issue, which is extremely helpful. I simply suggest that some day someone must get parliamentary draftsmen to use modern language in today’s Bills when drafting corporate structures, which have moved on quite considerably from those that parliamentary draftsmen used to create even 10 or 15 years ago. I will not pursue that point today, but the Minister might like to do so. I am grateful to him for tabling the amendment. On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendment No. 21 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 693 c1108
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Costs ICT Investment Public appointments Workplace pensions Pensions National insurance contributions Staff Standards Personal Accounts Delivery Authority
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:07:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408120
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408120
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408120