Proceeding contribution from Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 5 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on UK Borders Bill.
UK Borders Bill
The point that we were discussing, to which the noble Lord has just replied, is whether the employer would feel obliged by the legislation to demand documentation of this sort from anybody who belonged to an ethnic minority, simply to safeguard his own position now that we have created a criminal offence which the employer might commit if he failed to take sufficient precautions against hiring somebody who was not legally empowered to take a job in this country. The two effects combined—the existence of these documents, plus the criminal penalties that may be levied against an employer—would be a standing temptation to any employer to safeguard himself by routinely asking for the production of this document, even when a national insurance certificate was already in existence. One would be belt-and-braces assured that the BID would always be asked for whenever someone with the appearance of belonging to an ethnic minority walked in to apply for a job with an employer.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 693 c181-2GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Children Biometrics Asylum Commission for Racial Equality Borders ICT Immigration Human trafficking Discrimination Ethnic groups Race relations Refugees Border and Immigration Agency
- Legislation
- UK Borders Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:50:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408836
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408836
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408836