Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris McCafferty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 10 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill [Lords].


Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill [Lords]

The word ““delighted”” would be inappropriate, but I am certainly pleased to speak about the Bill because forced and child marriages constitute serious and recurrent violations of human rights, and the rights of the child. In Britain, the root causes of this practice lie mainly in the tendency for traditions to become fossilised in migrant communities that are often more conservative than those remaining in home countries. Let us face it, the practice occurs predominantly in Muslim communities, but also in others. It is almost entirely women and girls who are subjected to this infringement of their personal liberty, but men may also be forced to marry—for example, when young men display gay tendencies, which is not acceptable in their community. It is quite outrageous that under the cloak of ““respect”” for the culture and traditions of certain communities, some authorities tolerate forced marriages, even though such marriages violate the fundamental rights of each and every victim. It is not a case of stigmatising Islam, but of saying that tolerance or feeling for culture cannot serve as an excuse for condoning such marriages, or for hiding behind moral blindness.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c1388-9 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Age Children's rights Women Equality Human rights Judiciary Immigration Domestic abuse Ethnic groups Family law Forced marriage Training Young people Religion Victim support schemes Forced Marriage Unit Judicial Studies Board Forced marriage protection orders Women's rights
Legislation
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk