Proceeding contribution from David Drew (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 July 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Carter Review (Legal Aid).
Carter Review (Legal Aid)
Does my hon. Friend accept that there is another problem with the tendering process: one that relates to the subject of tenders? National Family Mediation claims that its work saves money for the state and is much more successful than court processes in trying to deal with family break-up. It has told me that because mediation will now often be subject to court action—that being the way in which the tendering process will operate—its valuable work is being pushed to the margins. The mediation agency in Gloucestershire is considering closure. I am sure that other hon. Members have received similar information.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 462 c501-2WH
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Disadvantaged Legal profession Equality Fees and charges Human rights Legal aid scheme Ethnic groups Reform Legal Aid Procurement Review
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:57:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410746
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410746
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410746