Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Hugh Bayley (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 July 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Carter Review (Legal Aid).


Carter Review (Legal Aid)

The point is that if we have a system that overpays some and leaves insufficient money for the rest, we ought to limit the overpayments so that more is available for the others. We need to find ways to build incentives into the legal aid system to reduce unnecessary expenditure. For example, some cases come to court only because legal aid is available and could be settled properly and justly if they did not. Let us look at some family law cases, which account for the largest part of the civil legal aid budget. The National Audit Office produced a report in March of this year, entitled ““Legal Aid and Mediation for People Involved in Family Breakdown””. It states:"““The average cost of legal aid in non-mediated cases is estimated at £1,682, compared with £752 for mediated cases, representing an additional annual cost to the taxpayer of some £74 million.””"


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
462 c516WH 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Disadvantaged Legal profession Equality Fees and charges Human rights Legal aid scheme Ethnic groups Reform Legal Aid Procurement Review
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk