Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.


Offender Management Bill

moved Amendment No. 1: 1: Clause 3, page 3, line 31, leave out ““designate individuals”” and insert ““authorise individuals under section 10(2) to act”” The noble and learned Baroness said: My Lords, these amendments are technical in nature. They were identified as necessary by parliamentary counsel during his final proofreading of the Bill. We hope that they will be entirely uncontroversial. Amendment No. 1 simply brings the wording in Clause 3 into line with that used elsewhere in the Bill, so that we talk consistently about individuals being ““authorised”” rather than ““designated””. Amendments Nos. 4, 5 and 6 to Clause 10 and Amendment No. 13 to Schedule 3 clarify the definitions of providers of probation services and officers of providers of probation services, to enable consequential amendments to work properly. Amendments Nos. 8 and 9 apply to the offences related to prison security in Clauses 25 and 26. Their effect is simply to bring consistency to the way in which ““specified”” is dealt with in the various subsections. I beg to move. On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 3 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c11 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Contracts Charities Offenders Qualifications Prisons Staff Probation National Probation Service for England and Wales Voluntary organisations Training Young offenders Security Probation boards Probation trusts
Legislation
Offender Management Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk