Proceeding contribution from Lord Garnier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
The Minister is in danger of conflating two separate arguments and therefore of misleading himself. There is a distinction between my views on the amendments and the structure that the Bill provides and those of Labour Members such as the hon. Member for Walthamstow (Mr. Gerrard). He disapproves of the contracting-out of what has until now been a state-provided service—that is what the argument over contestability is about. On the other hand, I have no philosophical objection to contestability, but I do have an argument with the Government—with which the hon. Gentleman might agree—about the top-down micro-management of the probation services from the Secretary of State’s office via his various subordinate quango offices. So long as the Minister understands the distinction between those two, or possibly three, sets of arguments, he will not mislead himself or the House.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 463 c354
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conflict of interests Offenders Private sector Public sector NHS trusts Probation Standards Reoffenders Basic skills Community orders
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:56:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412264
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412264
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412264