Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.


Offender Management Bill

I shall try to respond to the points that have been made. I am grateful for the relatively warm welcome that the hon. and learned Member for Harborough and the hon. Member for Taunton have given the Government amendment in lieu. I believe that we have moved and that we have listened to another place, but obviously there are still matters on which I should be happy to reflect, which the hon. and learned Gentleman has brought to the House’s attention. The hon. and learned Gentleman asked, in broad terms, whether it was more appropriate for the duty to rest with the Secretary of State rather than with the provider. We have taken the view that regional commissioners will have a strategic overview of all services that are being delivered in their region. That means that they will be better placed to assess and police potential conflicts of interest than the Secretary of State. However, I am again happy to reflect on what the hon. and learned Gentleman said and to listen to the points that have been made. The hon. and learned Gentleman asked why we had used the words ““so far as practicable””. Parliamentary counsel suggested that they were the most appropriate form of words to cover the issues raised in another place. I am happy to reflect on what the hon. and learned Gentleman said, but that was the point that was put to us.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
463 c384 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conflict of interests Offenders Private sector Public sector NHS trusts Probation Standards Reoffenders Basic skills Community orders
Legislation
Offender Management Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk