Proceeding contribution from Lord Garnier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
Before the Minister concludes his remarks, may I clarify his position, so that I can respond more or less intelligently to it? As I understand it, the Government now apparently accept Lords amendment No. 14, which would remove clause 5(6), but disagree with Lords amendment No. 35, which removes the word ““under”” and adds the words,"““or regulations under—""( ) section 5(1) or ( 3)(c),””" The Government wish to replace ““5(1) or (3)(c)”” with ““5(3)(c)””. The effect of the Government’s case is that the statutory instrument will be subject to the negative, as opposed to the affirmative, procedure. Will the Minister remind the House which bit of his argument puts forward that case?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 463 c386
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Conflict of interests Offenders Private sector Public sector NHS trusts Probation Standards Reoffenders Basic skills Community orders
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:56:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412322
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412322
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_412322