Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jim Devine (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 July 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Land Maintenance Companies.


Land Maintenance Companies

It is a great honour and a privilege to be an elected MP, but with that privilege come responsibilities and rights. One of those responsibilities is that we should be measured in our contributions when we are talking about constituency issues or companies that are causing concern. I shall talk about Greenbelt Group Ltd, which is a discreditable building company whose performance and behaviour has been a disgrace. As you are aware, Mrs. Anderson, as part of the planning process, developers must provide open spaces on new estates and show that plans are in place for the long-term care of those estates. In the past, open spaces were managed by local authorities, but in recent years the onus for maintaining such areas has fallen on developers. They have tended to offload that responsibility in one of two ways. They have transferred ownership of the land and responsibility for maintaining either to the local authority, a democratically elected body, or to the home owners. Home owners have been obliged to appoint a factor; if the factor failed, they could be fired and another company could be appointed. Both arrangements gave home owners control, but a worrying new trend is emerging, and urgent action is needed to avert a crisis that could affect tens of thousands of home owners throughout the UK.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
463 c297WH 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Complaints Contracts Housing Land Land use Maintenance Recreation spaces Parks Greenbelt Group
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk