Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on UK Borders Bill.


UK Borders Bill

My Lords, the Government have already acknowledged that this is bad legislation. They acknowledged that when they accepted the amendment during the 2006 Act to repeal Section 9 following widespread opposition inside and outside Parliament. We have been here many times and it is disgraceful that we are still discussing this matter, even after the pilot showed that Section 9 was not working in the Government’s favour. As with reporting restrictions and other measures, in the words of the Refugee Council, this is an ““inhumane and ineffective”” policy and it is in breach of the UN convention. It will only have the opposite effect to that intended, which is to cause fear and drive more children and young people underground or into destitution, as many noble Lords have said. There have been countless reports by the churches and voluntary organisations bearing that out. The Minister referred to this section in Grand Committee as, "““a tool in the armoury””.—[Official Report, 18/7/07; col. GC 65.]," which implies that the Government are doing battle with asylum seekers in order to meet their targets. That is somewhat in contrast to the professed policy under the new code, which we discussed on Tuesday, to provide proper protection and keep children and others safe from harm.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
695 c367-8 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Appeals Asylum Detainees Borders Health services Families Human rights Immigration Exemptions Migrants Mental illness Nationality Pregnancy Registration Torture Repatriation Border and Immigration Agency
Legislation
UK Borders Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk