Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tony Lloyd (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [Lords].


Legal Services Bill [Lords]

I begin by pointing out to the House that I had to miss the earlier part of the debate because I had to go to this evening's meeting of the parliamentary Labour party. My hon. Friend the Member for Bassetlaw (John Mann) touched on an important point. A very badly written article that appeared in The Times this morning seemed to imply that the amendments were something to do with the miners' compensation scheme, which, in reality, is completely irrelevant to the impact of the Bill. The hon. Member for Huntingdon (Mr. Djanogly) shakes his head. I am happy to give way if he can demonstrate how they are connected. He chooses not to do that, which is interesting in itself because it begins to get us to the whole Conservative—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
464 c615 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disciplinary proceedings Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Appeals Advisory services Conflict of interests Legal profession Fees and charges Licensing Judiciary EU law Exemptions Legal opinion Industrial diseases Law Society Misconduct Professions Public appointments Mining Ombudsman Lord Chief Justice Regulation Trade unions Rural areas Solicitors Trade marks General Council of the Bar Legal Services Board Office for Legal Complaints Alternative business structures Legal Services Consumer Panel
Legislation
Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk