Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 15 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [Lords].
Legal Services Bill [Lords]
The hon. Gentleman is right inasmuch as the miners' compensation scheme refers to incidents that happened before the Bill, so I suppose that he could say it is irrelevant. However, the issues involved in the scheme are directly relevant to the issues in the Bill, as I made clear—if he had been here for my earlier remarks, he would understand that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 464 c615
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Compensation Codes of practice Accountability Appeals Advisory services Conflict of interests Legal profession Fees and charges Licensing Judiciary EU law Exemptions Legal opinion Industrial diseases Law Society Misconduct Professions Public appointments Mining Ombudsman Lord Chief Justice Regulation Trade unions Rural areas Solicitors Trade marks General Council of the Bar Legal Services Board Office for Legal Complaints Alternative business structures Legal Services Consumer Panel
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:39:38 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_417235
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_417235
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_417235