Proceeding contribution from Lord Neill of Bladen (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
My Lords, I have said sufficient on that point. I move that we restore the text in Amendment No. 74 and in the other 10 or 12 passages where the very same point arises, and that we require the concurrence of the Lord Chief Justice in these various appointments and removals from office. Moved, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 74A to 77A, leave out ““agree”” and insert ““disagree””.—(Lord Neill of Bladen.)
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 695 c749
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Advisory services Legal profession Finance Licensing Judiciary Legal opinion Dismissal Law Society Misconduct Membership Public appointments Pensions Ombudsman Staff Lord Chief Justice Regulation Trade unions Rural areas Solicitors Legal Services Board Alternative business structures Legal Services Consumer Panel
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:52:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418045
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418045
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418045