Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
My Lords, in all the other places where the concurrence of, or some participation by, the Lord Chief Justice has been taken out, he is out completely. The only mention of him in the Bill is in connection with his having to be consulted before an ordinary member is appointed. From all the other places where he had been put in previously, he has been taken out completely. Is that not so?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 695 c751
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Advisory services Legal profession Finance Licensing Judiciary Legal opinion Dismissal Law Society Misconduct Membership Public appointments Pensions Ombudsman Staff Lord Chief Justice Regulation Trade unions Rural areas Solicitors Legal Services Board Alternative business structures Legal Services Consumer Panel
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:37:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418049
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418049
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418049