Proceeding contribution from John Butterfill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 19 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill.
Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill
My hon. Friend does not realise that the scenario he describes could happen today, without this Bill being enacted. The only difference is that it would happen only if one of the parties lost its mutuality. The members would have to vote for that. Any British mutual can be bought by an overseas entity of any type whatsoever, but its members would need to vote for that, and it would lose its mutuality en route. That makes no difference to the scenario my hon. Friend describes. It simply enables them both to remain mutuals.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 464 c1083
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Channel Islands Fees and charges Insurance companies Isle of Man Financial Services Authority Mergers Mutual societies Subsidiary companies European economic area
- Legislation
- Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill 2006-07
- Financial Mutuals Arrangements Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:03:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418344
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418344
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_418344