Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Christopher Chope (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 19 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill.


Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill

If one looks at the history of the hybrid instrument procedure, one sees that it has always been the last desperate throw of the people who have been challenged on the issue—to say, ““We cannot afford to delay.”” It so happens that there would be no delay if the petition were rejected and that in the other House there is what is called, I think, an expedited hybrid instrument procedure to cover the scenario to which my hon. Friend refers. We should not have too much haste if that is going to result in people feeling or being prejudiced against as a result of a takeover of an organisation, in which they have a mutual interest, by an EEA mutual.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
464 c1085-6 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Channel Islands Fees and charges Insurance companies Isle of Man Financial Services Authority Mergers Mutual societies Subsidiary companies European economic area
Legislation
Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill 2006-07
Financial Mutuals Arrangements Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk