Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 15 November 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Daedalus Airfield.


Daedalus Airfield

I entirely accept the point that the hon. Gentleman makes. My assumption—it can only be an assumption at this point, as I do not have the definitive reasons—is that the MCA acquired the site to protect the continuance of search-and-rescue helicopter operations from the site. The size of the site and the future lease of other aspects of the aerodrome would have been part of its business considerations in assessing what the MCA could get back from the Hampshire police authority, in order to justify public expenditure to provide the services that we expect. I have no further information on that. I know that this sounds as though we are absolving ourselves of responsibility but, sadly, we are not the decision-makers in this case. That lies firmly at the door of the Hampshire police authority and Hampshire constabulary, and the whole tenor of my response to the hon. Gentleman's very effective explanation, if I may say so, of the importance of Daedalus to the local community, which we fully support and understand, is that it is Hampshire constabulary's decision to say that the runway is no longer available. That is where the matter rests. I can reassure the House and the hon. Gentleman that the MCA's operation has not been affected by the decision to close the airfield to general aviation. I hope that he and the House will accept that the decision taken by the police is their decision.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
467 c936 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Aviation Closures Airports Rescue services Maritime and Coastguard Agency Hampshire and Isle of Wight Constabulary South East England Development Agency Lee-on-the-Solent
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk