Proceeding contribution from Bishop of Chelmsford (Bishops (affiliation)) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL].
Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Bill [HL]
Perhaps I may clarify that the relationship of the person or agency whose account has gone dormant, and whose pass book is discovered in the attic, is with the bank and with no one else. Therefore, there may be a relationship between that bank or building society and the reclaim fund, but not between the person and the fund. We need to make clear how that triangular relationship works. Am I correct?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c68GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Compensation Databases Codes of practice Charities Companies Assets Bank services Banks Building societies Fraud Finance Financial Services Authority Private sector Lotteries Public bodies Registration Regulation Repayments Shareholders Big Lottery Fund Commission on Unclaimed Assets
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:25:53 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428550
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428550
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428550