Proceeding contribution from Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].
Climate Change Bill [HL]
I put my name to the amendment because I also felt that there needed to be a positive outcome if budgets failed to be met, and this seemed to offer a very practical and focused way forward. As I think I have said before, it is very nice to think of the Secretary of State of the day being dragged away to the Tower of London because the targets have not been met, but that will not happen. Judicial review might happen but that process would not contribute greatly to what we want to achieve here, which is to ensure that we meet our longer-term targets. The amendment or something like it would do that very well; hence, I am very happy to support it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 697 c540
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Climate change Carbon dioxide Environment protection Energy Pollution control Standards Carbon emissions UK emissions trading scheme Climate Change Committee
- Legislation
- Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:00:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430971
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430971
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_430971