Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 December 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Climate Change Bill [HL].


Climate Change Bill [HL]

I cannot understand why the Government are resisting this. Under the Bill the committee has only an advisory responsibility, and the Government can ignore the committee’s advice if they wish. If at the end of a five-year period there was a conflict between the committee and the Government about the action required, we might find that there was a shortfall irrespective of whatever recommendation the committee has made during that period. What mechanism would then exist to ensure that we went into the next period with a policy to deal with deficits from the previous period?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c543 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Climate change Carbon dioxide Environment protection Energy Pollution control Standards Carbon emissions UK emissions trading scheme Climate Change Committee
Legislation
Climate Change Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk