Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hain (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 7 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.


Pensions Bill

I agree with the hon. Gentleman that the slippage—it seemed at one point that it might be a haemorrhage—from defined-benefit and final salary schemes to defined-contribution schemes needs to be arrested. I hope that with the deregulatory review—this is the industry's view, and I expect it to deliver on it, given that we are making life easier and providing an extra £250 million in funds for pension schemes—we will see a stop put to that and will keep final salary schemes and defined-benefit schemes as much as possible. On the ACA's proposals, we obviously continue to consider all those things. The matter was raised with me at a dinner with representatives of the pensions industry, when one representative asked whether I was strongly in favour of the risk-sharing alternative. The rest of the representatives, who were reasonably representative of the industry, turned on the man who asked me the question and said, ““No, we don't want to have anything to do with it.”” I believe someone is looking into that. Obviously, we will continue to consider everything.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
470 c59 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Costs Advisory services Women Pension credit Personal income Workplace pensions Poverty Pensions Personal pensions Means-tested benefits Pension funds State retirement pensions Small businesses Reform National employment savings trust scheme
Legislation
Pensions Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk