Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rosser (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].


Local Transport Bill [HL]

moved Amendment No. 109: 109: Clause 71, page 61, line 10, leave out ““one”” and insert ““two”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, the amendment would ensure that reviews of integrated transport authorities cannot be triggered by a single local authority acting alone and that reviews of ITAs involve the ITA itself. Clause 71 states: "““Any one or more of the authorities falling within subsection (2) may undertake a review””." The Government did not engage with the specific point in Committee, other than to say that guidance was the best place to deal with the detail of how reviews are to be carried out. How reviews are to be carried out is not the issue. The number of local authorities it takes to trigger a review is specified in the Bill—it says ““any one or more””. The amendment would provide a safeguard against vexatious reviews. By their very nature, existing ITAs are collaborative bodies. These amendments would also ensure that the ITA was party to its own review. This is likely to be a matter for guidance, but the amendment would ensure that any review of an ITA would be a collaborative exercise between local authorities and their ITA. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c1382-3 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Data protection Finance Fees and charges Licensing Greater London Exhaust emissions Large goods vehicles Local government Public transport National Assembly for Wales Passenger transport executives Transport Tolls Carbon emissions Low emission zones
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk