Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rosser (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 16 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Transport Bill [HL].


Local Transport Bill [HL]

My Lords, the amendment would not prove restrictive; it would merely ensure that non-elected members were appointed by the ITA. It would not exclude non-elected members. Either I am misunderstanding my noble friend’s reply, or my noble friend is misunderstanding the point of the amendment. It is clear that this will not be resolved now; my noble friend has wound up and it is up to me to say what I intend now to do. I shall have to read Hansard to see whether it is the amendment that is at fault or whether my noble friend has not fully understood its purpose. I do not intend to press it; I intend to withdraw it. Since this is the last amendment that I am moving—I have had a whole series—I place on record my thanks, which I did not do as we went through each amendment for a deliberate reason, to all Members of your Lordships’ House who have responded to them, including those whose enthusiasm for them may not have entirely matched mine. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 117 not moved.] Clause 75 [Delegation of local authority functions]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
697 c1385-6 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Data protection Finance Fees and charges Licensing Greater London Exhaust emissions Large goods vehicles Local government Public transport National Assembly for Wales Passenger transport executives Transport Tolls Carbon emissions Low emission zones
Legislation
Local Transport Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk