Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
We have language like ““backstop”” and ““compulsory””, and a letter the noble Lord, Lord Jones, wrote to me in December, after Second Reading, contained the words ““reserved power””. We are seeking some enlightenment. The only thing the Minister said was ““administrative purposes””. Administrative purposes come every day. What is this power intended to be kept for? If local authorities thought that it was likely to be frequently used, they would simply sit on their hands and say, ““We had better wait until we are told””.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c111GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Business Anti-social behaviour Charity Commission Gambling Commission Franchises Highways Agency Local government Office of Fair Trading Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:27:44 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437700
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437700
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437700