Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bach (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].


Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]

We have had a full debate on Clause 7; in many ways it deserves a full debate. The approach taken by some noble Lords who have spoken suggests that Clause 7 will be implemented and used on a regular, day-to-day basis and that local authorities will be directed and told what to do, or else, almost from the very start. I attempted to describe the Government’s view on this when dealing with the previous amendment moved by the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, but I need to try again in order to persuade the Committee that these are not savage powers that will be used by a ruthless organisation which is the creature of government; it is a sensible provision which is supported by business, by the National Consumer Council and by the Trading Standards Institute. I disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Cope. He said that because this is a national body, it is not bothered at all, effectively, about local government independence. I do not accept that. The people who will make up that body will have been working in trading standards for many years. The noble Baroness, Lady Wilcox, I believe, is a distinguished ex-president of that body and an even more distinguished vice-president of it now.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c120GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Business Anti-social behaviour Charity Commission Gambling Commission Franchises Highways Agency Local government Office of Fair Trading Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
Legislation
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk