Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].


Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]

I hope that we can have clarity about this. I understand what the noble Lord, Lord Jones, said at Second Reading; that is, if there is a franchise which has more than one branch in different local authority areas, it plainly falls within the scope of the clause. However, if it is trading under the name of a multiple chain, but is nevertheless an individual franchise in only one local authority area, it is unlikely that it falls within Clause 20. Similarly, although a pub may come within an overall chain of pubs, its tenant, operating in a single authority, would not fall within Clause 20. We need clarity about this.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
698 c149-50GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Business Anti-social behaviour Charity Commission Gambling Commission Franchises Highways Agency Local government Office of Fair Trading Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
Legislation
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk