Proceeding contribution from Lord Cope of Berkeley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
The noble Viscount, Lord Colville, has put much greater precision on what I said about when it comes to the crunch. That is exactly the sort of thing that I was talking about. I am most grateful to the Minister for undertaking to clarify all that in writing, including the point made by the noble Viscount. On that basis, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 65A and 65B not moved.] Clause 20 agreed to. Clause 21 agreed to. Clause 22 [““Relevant function””]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c153GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Business Anti-social behaviour Charity Commission Gambling Commission Franchises Highways Agency Local government Office of Fair Trading Regulation Local Better Regulation Office
- Legislation
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:36:30 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437802
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437802
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_437802