Proceeding contribution from Lord De Mauley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 30 January 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL].
Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 122: 122: Clause 38, page 15, line 36, at end insert— ““( ) where the person on whom the notice is to be served has registered a primary authority, that notice must be served through the primary authority on such person as shall be registered with the primary authority as competent to receive such notices,”” The noble Lord said: This amendment ensures that, in the case of a multi-site business, any notice is served on the right, sufficiently senior person. For example, a local manager should not be able to get away with paying a penalty in order to keep his own lapse of compliance secret from his bosses. The amendment would ensure that the company was served with the penalty, at least where it had registered a primary authority. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c372GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Courts Business Civil proceedings Civil Aviation Authority Enforcement Fixed penalties Ofgem Fines Regulation Local Better Regulation Office Stop notices
- Legislation
- European Communities Act 1972
- Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:28:35 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440749
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440749
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_440749