Proceeding contribution from Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].
Employment Bill [HL]
I would like to comment on deemed consent, which can be a very dangerous provision. I can recall many cases in which someone claimed that they never received a letter of any sort. In magistrates’ courts, very often the first thing that a person knows is when they get a judgment through the post, and they never heard anything before that; and it could be the same in the tribunal. In the magistrates’ courts, you have the right to have a case reopened because it was judged on a deemed consent. I hope that if there is a provision for deemed consent there will be a similar provision in this case.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c482GC
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Codes of practice ACAS Employment Industrial relations Employment Tribunals Service Industrial disputes Monitoring Surveillance Tribunals Trade unions Sick pay Grievance procedures
- Legislation
- Employment Bill (HL) 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 02:33:19 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442159
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442159
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_442159