Proceeding contribution from Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 February 2008. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill.
Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill
The Minister will forgive me for interrupting. In family cases and in others, the phrase ““best interests”” has very frequently been equated with welfare. It is a primary consideration under Article 3. Does the Minister really think that new Clause 142A(3)(b), which refers to having, "““regard to the welfare of the offender””," is the equivalent of a primary consideration? My interpretation is that it is coming a long way down the scale. I accept what the noble Earl, Lord Onslow, says, but it is certainly not up the scale, as a primary consideration would be.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 698 c1111
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal proceedings Children in care Administration of justice Death Age Alternatives to prison Custodial treatment Fines Probation Rehabilitation Sentencing Young offenders Reoffenders Youth rehabilitation orders
- Legislation
- Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:50:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_444133
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_444133
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_444133