Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on treaty on Treaty of Lisbon (No. 4).
Treaty of Lisbon (No. 4)
I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman's usual generosity. I want open competitive markets, but I object to the use of the word ““undistorted”” because it denotes that a state of perfect competition can be reached: it cannot. He talks about unfettered markets and so on, but I want markets with certain fetters. I want fetters so that we do not send schoolboys up chimneys to clean them and so that we do not have unguarded machinery at work. I want people to have that kind of social protection. I find the concept of undistorted competition ridiculous on the grounds of both economics and social protection. I want open and competitive markets, but ““undistorted”” is a nonsense word.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 471 c996-7
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Competition European Union EU internal trade EU integration EU institutions Treaties European Commission Treaty of Lisbon
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:27:40 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_444818
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_444818
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_444818