Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Wedderburn of Charlton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 25 February 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Employment Bill [HL].


Employment Bill [HL]

With leave, I wish to make a personal statement of apology to the Committee about the way in which the noble Baroness, Lady Turner, and I left our position on Clause 4 on 4 February. On reading Hansard, we realised that we had left a false impression, which should be put right before Report. My noble friend and I believe that Clause 4 is not compatible with Article 6 of the European convention, which accords to everyone the right to a fair and public hearing before an independent tribunal, which pronounces judgment publicly. That is made worse by the fact that the European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment given by 13 judges against five dissentients on 13 November 2007, in the case of DH v Czech Republic, restated the court’s interpretation of the law—especially in respect of waiver of convention rights. We intend to take that position further on Report. I have already written to the Minister. I apologise again for our failure to make that clear to the Committee in our earlier proceedings. Clause 5 [Conciliation before bringing of proceedings]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
699 c65GC 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Compensation ACAS Employment Industrial disputes Health and safety Employment agencies Minimum wage Temporary employment Tribunals
Legislation
Employment Bill (HL) 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk