Proceeding contribution from John Healey (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 26 February 2008. It occurred during Legislative debate on Local Government.
Local Government
Cheshire was in a relatively unusual situation compared with other parts of the country. Not only were two competing proposals submitted under the same single process but, uniquely, both proposals met the five criteria that we established at the outset. That was not the situation anywhere else in the country. We had to set out a way of making a judgment between the two proposals, and in June we published our arrangements and made clear how we would carry them out. It was to be on the basis of which of the proposals, based on the evidence submitted to us, would deliver to a greater extent the benefits for which we were looking in three principal areas—first, strategic leadership; secondly, the empowerment of local people and local neighbourhoods; and thirdly, quality public services. Those made up our yardstick to try to distinguish between the relative merits of the two proposals.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 472 c1042
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Local government Reorganisation Unitary councils Cheshire
- Legislation
- Cheshire (Structural Changes) Order 2008
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 00:54:05 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_449156
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_449156
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_449156